Is our AI model robust and suitable for its intended use across different deployment contexts?

This page is a fallback for search engines and cases when javascript fails or is disabled.
Please view this card in the library, where you can also find the rest of the plot4ai cards.

Safety & Environmental Impact Category
Design PhaseInput PhaseModel PhaseDeploy PhaseMonitor Phase
Is our AI model robust and suitable for its intended use across different deployment contexts?

Are you testing the product in a real environment before releasing it? When deploying an AI model, it is critical to ensure that it aligns with the intended use and functions effectively in its operational environment. If the model is trained and tested on data from one context but deployed in a different one, there is a significant risk of performance degradation, or unintended behavior. This is particularly important in cases where environmental changes, unexpected inputs, or shifts in user interaction occur. Additionally, reinforcement learning models may require retraining when objectives or environments deviate slightly from the training setup. Beyond data, other contextual factors like legal, cultural, or operational constraints must be considered to ensure successful deployment.

If you answered No then you are at risk

If you are not sure, then you might be at risk too

Recommendations

  • Use different data for testing and training. Make sure diversity is reflected in the data and that it aligns with the intended deployment environment. Specify your training approach, statistical methods, and ensure edge cases are adequately tested. Explore different environments and contexts to make sure your model is trained with the expected variations in data sources. Account for different distribution shifts in testing and real-wolrd scenarios.
  • For reinforcement learning, ensure the objective functions are robust and adaptable to slight changes in the environment.
  • Are you considering enough aspects beyond data, such as legal, cultural, or operational factors? Did you forget any environmental variable that could affect performance or safety? Could limited sampling due to high costs or practical constraints pose a challenge? Document these risks and seek organizational support. The deploying organization is accountable for addressing these risks, either through mitigation or by explicitly accepting them, which may require additional resources or budget.
  • Consider applying techniques such as cultural effective challenge. This creates an environment where technology developers and stakeholders can actively participate in questioning the AI design and process. This approach better integrates social, cultural, and contextual factors into the design and helps prevent issues such as target leakage, where the AI system trains for an unintended purpose.
  • Set up mechanisms for real-time monitoring post-deployment. Continuously validate that the system is aligned with its intended use and can adapt or alert for significant changes in context or input.
  • Engage end-users in real-world testing to bridge any gaps between assumptions and practical application.